<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cafaro&#039;s Ramblings &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cafaro.net/category/david/technology/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.cafaro.net</link>
	<description>A site to collect thoughts and figures of the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No spellcheck on the EeePC 1000 40G</title>
		<link>https://www.cafaro.net/2008/09/08/no-spellcheck-on-the-eeepc-1000-40g/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cafaro.net/2008/09/08/no-spellcheck-on-the-eeepc-1000-40g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Caf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eeepc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eeepc 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eeepc 40G]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cafaro.net/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So been playing around more with my EeePC 1000.  Still really like it, but I&#8217;ve got two major complaints now besides the security issues I&#8217;ve mentioned before. There is NO English spellchecking installed for StarOffice.  The install of StarOffice includes spellchecking for Polish but apparently not English.  I&#8217;ve checked all over and that&#8217;s it, no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So been playing around more with my EeePC 1000.  Still really like it, but I&#8217;ve got two major complaints now besides the security issues I&#8217;ve mentioned before.</p>
<ol>
<li>There is NO English spellchecking installed for StarOffice.  The install of StarOffice includes spellchecking for Polish but apparently not English.  I&#8217;ve checked all over and that&#8217;s it, no English spell checking and no easy way to add it yet.  This is a major problem for me, I&#8217;m a terrible speller.</li>
<li>The right shift key is too far to the right.  I&#8217;m a touch typist and key placement is important.  I&#8217;m used to having the right shift key and instead I hit the up arrow while typing.  I&#8217;ll probably solve this by remapping the shift key and the arrow key, but it&#8217;s a bad design.  Luckily it&#8217;s something I can work around, just annoying.</li>
</ol>
<p>I really do need to find a solution to the spell check, or bite the bullet and do the Fedora install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cafaro.net/2008/09/08/no-spellcheck-on-the-eeepc-1000-40g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Published another Grid Article</title>
		<link>https://www.cafaro.net/2007/08/11/published-another-grid-article/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cafaro.net/2007/08/11/published-another-grid-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Caf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cafaro.net/2007/08/11/published-another-grid-article/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wrote another article about Grids.  This one is about migrating from WS-RF to WS-RT.  It covers some of the general issues and components of each standard you&#8217;ll have to focus on and provides links to more detailed information for implementing your solution.  I had some experience with WS-RF and this article helped me learn more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrote another article about Grids.  This one is about migrating from WS-RF to WS-RT.  It covers some of the general issues and components of each standard you&#8217;ll have to focus on and provides links to more detailed information for implementing your solution.  I had some experience with WS-RF and this article helped me learn more about WS-RT myself.  Hope it help others as well!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/grid/library/gr-wsrfwsrt/index.html" title="Migrating from WSRF to WSRT" target="_blank">Migrating from WSRF to WSRT </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cafaro.net/2007/08/11/published-another-grid-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New GAIM, uhm, I mean Pidgin</title>
		<link>https://www.cafaro.net/2007/05/07/new-gaim-uhm-i-mean-pidgin/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cafaro.net/2007/05/07/new-gaim-uhm-i-mean-pidgin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Caf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cafaro.net/2007/05/07/new-gaim-uhm-i-mean-pidgin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest version of Pidgin (used to be gaim) was released. I haven&#8217;t found any nice rpm&#8217;s for Fedora Core 6 yet (that would install) so I went ahead and made my own. No warranty whatsoever on anything about them. They work on my FC6 box, and that&#8217;s about all I know. The rpm files [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest version of <a title="Pidgin IM" href="http://pidgin.im" target="_blank">Pidgin</a> (used to be gaim) was released.  I haven&#8217;t found any nice rpm&#8217;s for Fedora Core 6 yet (that would install) so I went ahead and made my own.  No warranty whatsoever on anything about them.  They work on my FC6 box, and that&#8217;s about all I know.</p>
<p><a title="Pidgin RPMs" href="http://www.cafaro.net/david/rpms/FC6/index.html" target="_blank">The rpm files are here.</a></p>
<p>UPDATE: Ok as many are well aware of Fedora Core has now switched over to Pidgin and the pidgin group now has a YUM repo setup and working for Fedora.  So my rpm&#8217;s aren&#8217;t needed, just go to <a title="Pidgin IM" href="http://pidgin.im" target="_blank">pidgin.im</a> and use their YUM repo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cafaro.net/2007/05/07/new-gaim-uhm-i-mean-pidgin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to redirect a default WordPress URL</title>
		<link>https://www.cafaro.net/2006/06/28/how-to-redirect-a-default-wordpress-url/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cafaro.net/2006/06/28/how-to-redirect-a-default-wordpress-url/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Caf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cafaro.net/2006/06/28/how-to-redirect-a-default-wordpress-url/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I was trying to help a friend who is replacing WordPress with another system and needed to redirect the WordPress URLs for old posts to the new URL and the new posts. Doesn&#8217;t seem like that would be too much of a problem, except that the default WordPress uses html get values and not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I was trying to help a friend who is replacing WordPress with another system and needed to redirect the WordPress URLs for old posts to the new URL and the new posts.  Doesn&#8217;t seem like that would be too much of a problem, except that the default WordPress uses html get values and not URLs to direct to a specific post.  Given I&#8217;m not a mod_rewrite expert, it took a little digging and playing to figure out how to do it.  Below is an example of how to do it using mod_rewrite and the .htaccess file in the root of the WordPress install:</p>
<pre>Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^p=1$
RewriteRule ^$ http://www.thenewdomain.com/the/new/url/story.html [R=301,L]</pre>
<p>This assumes that your hosting provider allows mod_rewrite and that .htaccess overrides are allowed.  The only problem with this is that the new url get the ?p=1 part tacked on to the end of the new url after redirect.  In this case it didn&#8217;t cause a problem, but it doesn&#8217;t look perfect.  I&#8217;m still trying to figure out how to dump this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cafaro.net/2006/06/28/how-to-redirect-a-default-wordpress-url/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security issue in GPG signed messages</title>
		<link>https://www.cafaro.net/2006/03/10/security-issue-in-gpg-signed-messages/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cafaro.net/2006/03/10/security-issue-in-gpg-signed-messages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Caf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cafaro.net/2006/03/10/security-issue-in-gpg-signed-messages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like there is a bug in GPG that would allow someone to inject misc. data into a cyptographically signed or encrypted message without invalidating the signature of the message. Basically, it means that checking the signature status of a GPG email will not guarantee that the message is what the original sender sent. Seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like there is a bug in GPG that would allow someone to inject misc. data into a cyptographically signed or encrypted message without invalidating the signature of the message.  Basically, it means that checking the signature status of a GPG email will not guarantee that the message is what the original sender sent.</p>
<p>Seems to effect all versions prior to 1.4.2.2, there are updates available.</p>
<p>More information <a title="GPG security annoucement" href="http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000216.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cafaro.net/2006/03/10/security-issue-in-gpg-signed-messages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

